[Minutes] RAX CG 2017-01-27

See

https://www.w3.org/2017/01/27-rax-minutes.html
and below as text. The next call will be 27 January

- Felix

   [1]W3C

      [1] http://www.w3.org/

                               - DRAFT -

                                 rax cg

27 Jan 2017

   [2]Agenda

      [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rax/2017Jan/0001.html

   See also: [3]IRC log

      [3] http://www.w3.org/2017/01/27-rax-irc

Attendees

   Present
          christian, christoph, felix

   Regrets
   Chair
          christian

   Scribe
          fsasaki

Contents

     * [4]Topics
         1. [5]going through draft document outline
         2. [6]discussion on milestones
         3. [7]next call
     * [8]Summary of Action Items
     * [9]Summary of Resolutions
     __________________________________________________________

   <scribe> scribe: fsasaki

going through draft document outline

   christoph: my focus is on XML to RDF
   ... can write about tools at hand
   ... on best practices, should we also add challenges
   ... e.g. with regards to generic mapping languages
   ... have a seperate section on "challenges"?
   ... christoph: in XML the same semantic relation can be
   expressed in many ways
   ... that is esp. relevant for XML > RDF

   christian: so have a section "core challenges"
   ... decide then later where it fits

   christopher would contribute to best practices, challenges,
   tools at hand

   christopher: also to use cases
   ... and the XML / RDF data needed
   ... "Standards available" means languages like rml?

   christian: yes

   christopher: processes - what is this?

   christian: tell people what steps to to take in what order
   ... in xml2rdf, general two approaches
   ... iterate through whole tree
   ... via xslt
   ... or take RDF point of view, via e.g. xquery
   ... view is rather - if I use XSLT, what to do?

   felix: example for rdf 2 xml process: rdf > sparql construct >
   use xslt

   christian: may make sense

   felix: may also make sense with json serialization, to make
   this interesting for web developers

   general agreement that the proposed document structure makes
   sense

   felix: can contribute a process example : RDF > sparql > XSLT
   processing

   christian: will look into examples and try to acquire people
   who work on the topic

discussion on milestones

   christian: we need to make a start for the next call
   ... have not thought about a conference yet, but we should try
   to have something by May

   discussion on where to publish this (conference, journal, ...)

next call

   17 February, 2 p.m. CET (in three weeks)

Summary of Action Items

Summary of Resolutions

   [End of minutes]

Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 13:30:19 UTC