Saturday, 30 August 2003
Wednesday, 27 August 2003
Tuesday, 26 August 2003
- Re: namespace nodes
- RE: Your comment on the F&O
- do computed namespace add to in-scope namespaces?
- Re: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators
- Re: namespace nodes in element content
- RE: Your comment on the F&O
- Re: Re: My details
- Re: local functions and variables
- RE: namespace nodes in element content
- RE: namespace nodes
- RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators
- Your comment on the F&O
- local functions and variables
- namespace nodes in element content
- namespace nodes
Monday, 25 August 2003
Sunday, 24 August 2003
Wednesday, 20 August 2003
Thursday, 21 August 2003
Tuesday, 19 August 2003
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
Wednesday, 20 August 2003
Tuesday, 19 August 2003
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- RE: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- RE: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- RE: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- [F/O] backreferences in regexen
Monday, 18 August 2003
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- RE: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- RE: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- RE: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- [xslt2 func/op] tokenizing "abba" to ("a","b","b","a")
- Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?
- Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?
- Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?
- Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?
Friday, 15 August 2003
Thursday, 14 August 2003
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-100: Promotion of untyped values in fn:distinct-values?
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-100: Promotion of untyped values in fn:distinct-val ues?
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-100: Promotion of untyped values in fn:distinct-values?
- RE: Casting to types derived from xs:NOTATION
- RE: XSLT comments
- RE: Additional comments/clarifications
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-044: 7.4.11 fn:normalize-unicode
- RE: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/
Wednesday, 13 August 2003
- XSLT comments
- RE: How to Compare URIs reference
- RE: [F&O] Comments on resolve-QName and expanded-QName
- RE: ORA-FO-REPLACE-MATCH 7.5.3: fn:replace
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-091: Result types that are determined based on input types
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-080: element node without QName
- RE: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-080: element node without QName
- RE: Casting to types derived from xs:NOTATION
- RE: Casting to types derived from xs:NOTATION
- RE: Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/
- RE: Casting to types derived from xs:NOTATION
Tuesday, 12 August 2003
- RE: Casting to types derived from xs:NOTATION
- Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/
- Casting to types derived from xs:NOTATION
- Comments on http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#N401458
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at
- RE: ORA-FO-ORGANIZATION 14.1.4 fn:number
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at
- RE: [XSLT2] missing namespace declaration in example
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-055: Section 9.3 comparison on date and time
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-048: shortest vs longest match.
Monday, 11 August 2003
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at
- RE: ORA-FO-AVG-TYPES 15.3.2 fn:avg
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-015: Better definition of term numeric
- RE: ORA-FO-ROOT 14.1.9 fn:root
- RE: ORA-FO-ORGANIZATION 14.1.4 fn:number
- RE: ORA-FO-DEEPEQUAL-NIL 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-094: Section 15 needs reference/definition of example variables
- [XSLT2] missing namespace declaration in example
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-093: fn:item-at
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-092: Wrong type name in 15.1.6
- RE: ORA-FO-DEEPEQUAL-NIL 15.2.1 fn:deep-equal
- RE: ORA-FO-WHITESPACE 7.4.10 fn:normalize-space
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-085: Clarify hyphen.
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-085: Clarify hyphen.
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-078: Return types of name functions
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-100: Promotion of untyped values in fn:distinct-val ues?
Sunday, 10 August 2003
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-098: Reference to Formal semantics should be only for static semantics.
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-095: section 15.1.7: wording about list-valued attributes
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-099: Chose better example
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-100: Promotion of untyped values in fn:distinct-values?
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-081: dm:name should be dm:node-name
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-083: fn:number() example
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-085: Clarify hyphen.
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-086: fn:lang() example
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-074: Context node
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-082: fn:number() on atomic context item
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-078: Return types of name functions
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-077: Add ref to dm:node-name in 14.1.2
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-079: Typo in 14.1.3
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-072: Clarify wording in Section 14 example data
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-068: checking base URI
Thursday, 7 August 2003
Friday, 8 August 2003
Thursday, 7 August 2003
Wednesday, 6 August 2003
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-067: type of argument $base of fn:resolve-URI
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-070: Fix examples in 11.2.1
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-069: Examples should use example.com in 11.2.1
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-062: fn:resolve-URI and unnamed namespace nodes
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-063: Improve section title of 10.2
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-060: Divide by zero on duration
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-058: Is 28:00:00Z an acceptable value?
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-055: Section 9.3 comparison on date and time
- RE: ORA-FO-INSCOPE-NAMESPACES 10.2.5 in-scope namespaces
- RE: ORA-FO-DEFAULT-NAMESPACE 10.1.1.2 Examples
Tuesday, 5 August 2003
- RE: ORA-FO-RETURN-TYPECHECK
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-040: 7.4.5 fn:contains
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-046: Use of URIs in examples (section 7.4.16)
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-043:
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-041: 7.4.6 fn:substring
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-050: Section 9
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-053: Cut note in 9.2
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-052: 9.1.1 Overflow on duration
- Re: MS-FO-LC1-051: Section 9.1
- RE: MS-FO-LC1-096: Section 15.1.7 add more complex examples
- Incorrect normalized core grammar in may 2 draft of formal semantics?
Monday, 4 August 2003
- Re: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0?
- RE: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0?
- RE: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0?
- RE: FW: DN-FO-09: 15.1.11 fn:distinct-values
- Re: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0?
- RE: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Proble m?
- RE: Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0?
- RE: ORA-FO-ERRORS 15.1.11 fn:distinct-values
- RE: FW: DN-FO-09: 15.1.11 fn:distinct-values
- RE: ORA-FO-NEGATIVE-ZERO 6.1 Numeric Types
- RE: SAG-FO-04: fn:trace()
- RE: XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators
Saturday, 2 August 2003
- Re: Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?
- XML Namespaces - A Need for Structure?
- Inherent Namespace Ambiguities - A Serious Fundamental Problem?
- What is an "XML Namespace"?
- Inappropriate use of XML Namespaces in XQuery, XPath 2.0 and XSLT 2.0?
- XML Schema WG comments on Functions and Operators