Thursday, 29 August 2002
Wednesday, 28 August 2002
Tuesday, 27 August 2002
- XSLT2 draft (16th August) XHTML output
- unparsed-entity-public-id in August XSLT2 draft
- XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Functions and Operators (16th August)
Monday, 26 August 2002
- RE: Is "Expanded QName" underspecified?
- RE: XPath 2.0 Functions xf:substring-before and xf:substring-aft er
- RE: Is "Expanded QName" underspecified?
- RE: escape-uri and utf-8
- RE: Data Model WD: [Issue-0062: Namespace fixups required]
- RE: Question about XPath 2.0 precedence rules
- RE: XSLT 2.0 WD -- question about handling Nans
- RE: XSLT 2.0: Typos in RFC3236 reference and citation
- XPath 2.0 Functions xf:substring-before and xf:substring-after
Thursday, 22 August 2002
Wednesday, 21 August 2002
Tuesday, 20 August 2002
- XSLT 2.0: Typos in RFC3236 reference and citation
- RE: Data Model WD: Appendix D
- Re: [public-qt-comments] <none>
- Typos in the F&O August working draft
- XML Query and XSL WGs on break until Sept
Monday, 19 August 2002
- [public-qt-comments] <none>
- Data Model WD: Appendix D
- Data Model and F&O WD: string values of atomic values
- Data Model WD: dm:atomic-value-sequence() function
- Data Model WD: Error checking
- Data Model WD: infoitem-to-text-nodes() function
- op:concatenate vs. xf:concat
- Data Model WD: [Issue-0062: Namespace fixups required]
- typed value of xs:anyType elements
- Issue-0079: String-value vs. string-value of the typed-value
- XQuery lexical stuff again
Saturday, 17 August 2002
- xf:escape-uri and utf-8
- data model of xslt/xpath 2.0 should be extensible
- XPath data model: identifying element/attribute type
Monday, 12 August 2002
Friday, 9 August 2002
- XSLT 2.0 WD -- question about handling Nans
- RE: Color Highlighting in document at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt2 0/
- Color Highlighting in document at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
- RE: inconsistent definition of order comparisons
- RE: Why don't we have "xsl:continue" or "xsl:break" element?
Tuesday, 6 August 2002
- inconsistent definition of order comparisons
- Re: inconsistent definition of order comparisons
- Why don't we have "xsl:continue" or "xsl:break" element?
Monday, 5 August 2002
Saturday, 3 August 2002
Friday, 2 August 2002
Thursday, 1 August 2002
- XSL 2.0 - Proposal for a indirect dereferencing requirement.
- XSLT 2.0 - Proposal for additional Varaible requirement.