- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:46:46 -0500
- To: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, ted@w3.org, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, jean-gui@w3.org, tgambet@w3.org
On 18 Jun 2010, at 4:41 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Saturday 19 June 2010, Ian Jacobs wrote: > >> Out of curiosity, is there a more abstract UI that would be useful to >> people (hiding at first glance the well-formedness test, for >> example): >> >> * I am interested in maximum browser compatibility >> * I am interested in XML-compatibility, and am ok with extra >> processing >> >> I made up those two, but perhaps there is a simpler interface for >> newbies. > > Not that I'm aware of. But if it does, not that it matters to me > personally > much, I'm not sure if it would be appropriate to call it a > "validator" -- that > term has a pretty strong formal odor. And since that odor attracts a lot of people maybe we shouldn't mess with it... _ Ian -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/ Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 21:46:49 UTC