- From: Ville Skytt¸«£ <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 00:06:51 +0300
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
- Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, ted@w3.org, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, jean-gui@w3.org, tgambet@w3.org
On Friday 18 June 2010, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: > About the idea of disabling XML wellformedness checks, I want to > raise something for discussion here that I've already also brought > up off-list, which is: I don't think we should do XML > wellformedness checking on pages that are served as text/html. If we don't do that (for non-XML docs or at all) and leave it to SGML::Parser::OpenSP, validator will be bitten by OpenSP's XML limitations. I gather this is pretty much the reason the "extra" XML wellformedness check exists in the first place; it was added in April 2007, in validator 0.8.0 beta 1. More info: http://openjade.sourceforge.net/doc/xml.htm One example of this is that XHTML documents (no matter with what content type they are served with) containing something like: <p id="foo"class="bar"> (missing space between "foo" and class) will start to go unnoticed and declared valid by the validator, of course assuming there are no other errors the validator does catch. I think this would be such a serious problem that it should be considered only as a last resort, and if done, the note about XML support limitations that was there in validator < 0.8.0 should be brought back.
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 21:07:31 UTC