- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:41 +0200
- To: "public-qa-dev@w3.org list" <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Dec 9, 2009, at 10:38, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > The main two contenders seems to be Git and Mercurial; Git seems to a > growing number of tools, and more advanced features; Mercurial seems to > be easier to use, and possibly easier to set up on a larger number of > platforms. > > We’re interested to hear feedback on this question, in particular in the > form of sharing experience of using them (inside or outside of the W3C > community), and pros and cons of both systems. I'd prefer to see the W3C choose Mercurial, particularly due to familiarity. Mozilla and html5lib already use Mercurial. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 12:12:12 UTC