On Dec 9, 2009, at 10:38, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > The main two contenders seems to be Git and Mercurial; Git seems to a > growing number of tools, and more advanced features; Mercurial seems to > be easier to use, and possibly easier to set up on a larger number of > platforms. > > We’re interested to hear feedback on this question, in particular in the > form of sharing experience of using them (inside or outside of the W3C > community), and pros and cons of both systems. I'd prefer to see the W3C choose Mercurial, particularly due to familiarity. Mozilla and html5lib already use Mercurial. -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 12:12:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:54:56 UTC