- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 09:50:54 +0900
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: Julien <css.julien@gmail.com>, Public Quality Assurance archives <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Sep 15, 2007, at 22:06 , Bert Bos wrote: > The CSS working group had a meeting a few days ago and just > published its conclusions[1]. The group thinks the validator should > look like this: [snip] Would it be possible to send this answer as a follow-up to the thread on www-style and www-validator-css? http://www.w3.org/mid/4FBB0575-0AA0-43D3-96D8-33E4EBA704B5@w3.org Also, I would appreciate if the CSS WG could respond to the couple of replies on that list, e.g: [[ I do not feel that CSS should be the sum of all previous specifications as the CSS working group feels. This makes no sense to me as it would mean chaos in the end. ]] [[ Obsoleting CSS 1 sounds odd, since CSS 2 has in practice been abandoned and the rest is at various draft levels. It would leave the world with _no_ CSS specification that is both declared as authoritative and actually promoted by the organization that issued it. ]] thanks olivier
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 00:51:00 UTC