- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:44:35 +0900
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, "Jacobs B. Ian" <ij@w3.org>
Adding dave ragget and Ian Jacobs, editors of HTML 4.01
About this thread
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qa-dev/2007Aug/0003
Le 2 août 2007 à 09:29, olivier Thereaux a écrit :
> If they shouldn't be used, why are they listed in the DTD?
I think given the documentation found online. It was used by
microsoft IE. So I suspect that they didn't have support from the
rest of the group at this time, but that it could be a good idea.
> Why are some of these reserved attributes in an "IGNORE" section
> and others in the list of acceptable attributes for certain elements.
> Why are these reserved attributes not mentioned in the prose?
I added Ian and Dave for having clarifications, if they remember.
> I think it's a little futile to think of fixing the tools before we
> know for sure why the spec doesn't seem to agree with itself...
note in my mail ;) I didn't say we must fix the tool. I said in the
topic, "additional checking?"
I'm as surprised as you may be, and not sure about what we should do,
yet, on this matter.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 2 August 2007 00:44:47 UTC