On Mon, Jul 30, 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > Yes. The only tiny problem currently is that the validator 0.8.0 release > tarball contains the code that requires XML::LibXML >= 1.53, while the code > in CVS for both validator and the bundle has moved on and no longer has > version requirements for XML::LibXML. I don't think it's a big problem > uploading the bundle without that versioned dependency though; if you agree, > I'll go ahead and do it. Sure. Should be ok, I think. > Hm, isn't it there already, or is the version there not suitable for > validator's purposes? http://search.cpan.org/dist/SGML-Parser-OpenSP/ > 0.99 is what I'm using locally and shipping in Fedora, and the check script > has no version in its dependency to SPO (maybe due to the bug referred to in > below?)... The validator won't work with any version under 0.99, because of some bug fixed in that version. The problem is, if we require >= 0.99, the now named 0.100 will be deemed too old by perl. I've been trying to attract Bjoern and Terje's attention on this, but no reply so far. Bjoern in Cc: here. I guess it's fine to add SPO to the bundle without dependency. We can always requires >= 0.99 when the version snafu is fixed. > > Also, see: > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? > > func=detail&aid=1694004&group_id=106431&atid=644086 > > My +1 to 1.00 :) :) -- olivierReceived on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 23:31:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:54:52 UTC