Re: Status of parallel link checker?

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 00:51 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:

> And CVS already archives stuff for us, the code can be always
> retrieved with "cvs diff -r 4.21 -r 4.24 checklink".  So as far as I'm
> concerned, just reverting the stuff and proceeding from the 4.2.1
> baseline would be ok.

No objections voiced, so I'd like to proceed with this plan.  Unless
anyone objects, I'll revert the above changes this week's Friday (5th
May).

Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 21:32:43 UTC