Re: Status of parallel link checker?

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 00:51 +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:

> And CVS already archives stuff for us, the code can be always
> retrieved with "cvs diff -r 4.21 -r 4.24 checklink".  So as far as I'm
> concerned, just reverting the stuff and proceeding from the 4.2.1
> baseline would be ok.

No objections voiced, so I'd like to proceed with this plan.  Unless
anyone objects, I'll revert the above changes this week's Friday (5th

Received on Tuesday, 2 May 2006 21:32:43 UTC