- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:01:00 +0900
- To: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <ze.reaper@gmail.com>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Jul 4, 2006, at 17:07 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote: > I think there is a problem with the "Unicorn output" : there should be > an enclosing error/warning/miscmessage tag for each > error/warning/miscmessage produced in the output_message_xml function. Indeed, good catch. One thing I noticed when doing this patch: what was your rationale for the usage of <miscmessages> (etc.)? I would have probably reused <informations> (and infocount, infolist, info), as used at least in the Feed validator. http://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/soap Generally speaking, since the unicorn response format is coming after the ones used in markup, css and feed validation services, two (and a half) of which are in production, we should try and keep as close as possible to these. -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 6 July 2006 06:01:04 UTC