Re: [PATCH] appendix C checker

On Jul 4, 2006, at 17:07 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote:
> I think there is a problem with the "Unicorn output" : there should be
> an enclosing error/warning/miscmessage tag for each
> error/warning/miscmessage produced in the output_message_xml function.

Indeed, good catch.

One thing I noticed when doing this patch: what was your rationale  
for the usage of <miscmessages> (etc.)? I would have probably reused  
<informations> (and infocount, infolist, info), as used at least in  
the Feed validator.

Generally speaking, since the unicorn response format is coming after  
the ones used in markup, css and feed validation services, two (and a  
half) of which are in production, we should try and keep as close as  
possible to these.


Received on Thursday, 6 July 2006 06:01:04 UTC