- From: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 15:29:21 -0500
- To: Jean-Guilhem Rouel <jean-gui@w3.org>
- Cc: olivier Thereaux <ot@zoy.org>, QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Sijtsche Smeman <sijtschesmeman@wanadoo.nl>
Hi, The new version is in CVS. Jean-Gui Jean-Guilhem Rouel a écrit : > > Hi Olivier, > > I have coded that. It's not exactly what I said in my previous mail > because it was quite complicated (it would have needed to modify all the > classes producing warnings). Instead, I have added a piece of code in > the method addWarning of the class Warnings: if the level of the warning > to add does not correspond to the requested level, it is not added. > An example of how to use it is available in > org/w3c/css/css/xhtml.properties.fr: > [[ > no-error-or-warning: <div><h2>Aucune erreur ou avertissement (<!-- > #ignored-warnings-count --> ignorés)</h2></div> > [...] > <!-- #warnings-count --> Avertissements (<!-- #ignored-warnings-count > --> ignoré(s)) > ]] > > I've partially modified the templates for other languages, but I prefer > native speakers to do that ;) > > What should I do with that? I don't think I have write access on > dev.w3.org. I can give you a patch or you can give me access to the > repository, as you wish :). > > Jean-Gui > > olivier Thereaux a écrit : >> >> >> On Dec 15, 2006, at 00:57 , Jean-Guilhem Rouel wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another suggestion would be to produce a warning only if its level >>> corresponds to what the user asked. That would avoid the computation >>> of a lot of warnings and a simple warnings.size() (or something like >>> that) would be enough to get the number of warnings. >> >> Sounds like a good idea. >> >> Minor problem: there would be no way to tell the user "there were >> other warnings, not shown here." with a link to the validation with >> all warnings. I suppose the Warnings class could keep a count of >> ignored warnings, too. >> >> Your proposed solution would fix the problem at hand, and also >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4081 >> >> Would you have a free hour to hack it up? :) >> >> (no, it's not *so* urgent, but we're releasing on monday, and having >> this would be very cool.) >> --olivier > -- Jean-Guilhem Rouel http://www.w3.org/People/Jean-Gui W3C Webmaster MIT/CSAIL http://www.w3.org/ Voice: +1.617.258.8143 Fax: +1.617.258.5999
Received on Saturday, 16 December 2006 20:29:33 UTC