- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:11:35 +0300
- To: QA-dev Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:38 +0900, olivier Thereaux wrote: > I finally took some time to check out SELinux, in order to understand > the issue a bit better. As a first reaction, I am frankly baffled that > this thing, however certainly useful, could go mainstream in many > distributions given its level of user/admin/developer-unfriendliness... Seconded. But it's there, not only in distrbutions, but AFAIK vanilla upstream kernel nowadays too. > I guess we'd first need to "audit" (is that the term) the Markup > Validator on a system running SELinux, and see what happens, e.g what > gets disallowed and why. Would you be able to do that? Or maybe Terje > could? That part is pretty trivial. Just install the validator on a machine that has SELinux in enforcing mode, then set SELinux into permissive mode ("/usr/sbin/setenforce 0" on the fly or SELINUX=permissive to /etc/selinux/config to get it applied after boot), and start using the validator, watching /var/log/audit/audit.log on FC4 or /var/log/messages on FC3. I've already done a part of this; I don't claim it to be complete or error free, but it's a start. See the commentary in the %prep section of the specfile at http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/w3c-markup-validator/devel/w3c-markup-validator.spec?root=extras&rev=.&view=auto I think I can do something about this this week, as I would like to test 0.7.0a2 on my FC4 box. > > To avoid inflicting that on users, the policy snippet above would have > > to be included in the policy that ships with the OS. > > Might be a stupid idea, but then, might not: wouldn't it be possible to > do that through the spec file in the packages, somehow? I tend to think theoretically yes. But every time I've seen someone ask it on the Fedora Extras or SELinux lists, the answer has been more or less a blunt "this is not currently doable, wait until we have the official way figured out". I guess in the strict meaning of the word, it is _doable_ now, but maybe just seen as ugly and thus frowned upon. Or then again I might be missing something. > > Anyway, FC4 will be out next Monday, [...] Unless someone yells, I'm > > going to request > > the pull tomorrow (to make sure it happens before Monday). > > Was it removed? Yes, from FC4 and FC5 devel, for now. It's still in FC3, but I have a open ticket on that, it doesn't work there either: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/149454
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 09:11:39 UTC