- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:08:13 +0900
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > It should link to http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=838 I thought of it, but for users not used to bugzilla, I was afraid following the link would be overwhelming, not to mention that the explanation for the issue is buried in the comments. On the other hand, the mailing-list post has info in a compact manner, mostly suggests to use another browser, and also points to the registry hack. Maybe I could send a summary/clarification message to the list, that we could link to? It should have a short explanation, suggested fix, link to the bug report for, as you mention, news, and also a link to lachlan's blog for the brave souls. > Note: file upload does not currently work with Internet Explorer on > Windows XP Service Pack 2, see the <a>bug report with details</a>. Fine. > Seems difficult to me, update would not get the change as you've made > it to HEAD while the production server should have code from a different > branch; and you would have to change the version number from 0.7.0-dev > back to 0.67, etc... I can cvs tag the two files and 'cvs update -r tag'. This is how I have been doing all the releases and all mid-cycle fix so far. The version number is not an issue, as it is in the "header" SSI that is untouched. -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2005 14:08:24 UTC