- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:54:48 +0100
- To: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
* olivier Thereaux wrote: >We will have a relatively busy agenda, thanks to contributions to the >wiki. To shorten that, my take on "fancy" characters is that we should comply with the rules for the relevant language, i.e., US english for most of it. Failing that we should be consistent with other parts of w3.org. If we use non-ascii characters we must use numeric character references or include the characters litterally UTF-8 encoded as there are various support issues for named character references in XHTML. I agree with documenting this somewhere, e.g. at the to-be-created http://esw.w3.org/topic/QaDev/StyleGuide Regarding test cases, some of the formats have test suites which we should be able to use directly; further, the specifications should also include examples which are either directly available or it should be easy to extract those from the specification. So I do not think there is a need to request additional test cases unless we have more specific requirements. Should we have more specific requirements, it is unlikely that the WGs produce them... Though I do not think this is really rele- vant as long as all we do is passing documents to OpenSP. I am not sure I understand the 'correct reference' issue. There is one thing we should indeed strive to achieve here, we should encourage working groups to provide detailed lists of conformance criteria that cannot be detected simply by validating using the schema the specification might provide to ease our task to implement checks relative to these additional criteria. There is some interest in better validation tools in the proposed mobile web initiative, it might indeed make sense to provide clear documentation on How To Get To Validation Faster for Working Groups... Though that likely depends on completing http://esw.w3.org/topic/MarkupValidator/M12N (which, as far as the documentation goes, I plan to do early April.) The general issue here seems to be how we interact with other parts of W3C which fits well into the issue I've suggested for this meeting, I would thus suggest we go over the style guide and test case issues quickly and focus on that. If we come to a conclusion on these matters someone should take an action to document this somewhere. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 15:55:24 UTC