- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 21:31:52 +0200
- To: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Cc: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
* Terje Bless wrote: >Do we see any clear wins in moving to a more “native” mod_perl API? i.e. does >dropping CGI support — the generic API that moots mod_perl 1 vs. 2 — actually >gain us anything? One thing that came up on #validator was auth proxying, we currently rely on mod_rewrite magic and access to %ENV vars for that, with the mod_perl API we could drop that and use mod_perl2 APIs instead. There might be other things aswell, like the /check/referer hacks, but I'm less certain about those. We'd clearly gain something by re-using existing Apache:: modules in the future, during or post-m12n. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 18 August 2005 19:31:36 UTC