Re: Policing (was: Reviewing) sgml-lib

On Oct 19, 2004, at 2:53 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> Question: what's the rationale for the directory naming here?
> e.g. "REC-html401-19991224" rather than "html401" or just "html" ?
> This is surely a working SGML catalogue, not a historical record!

As far as I understand, this is tied to the policy choice of whether we 
include WDs in the catalogue and whether we keep them or only "track" 
the "latest and bestest", no? And that, in turn, depends on the policy 
we are yet to clarify.


Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 02:57:44 UTC