- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:25:02 +0900
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <ACC0A8BB-B600-11D8-A0EA-000A95E54002@w3.org>
Based on some (strong) suggestion from Bjoern (IIRC), I "sampled" a few people, all active w-v participants, whether creating a list to discuss and provide help on validation problems would be a good idea. The current w-v charter does not include such messages, but the come in anyway, especially since the "send feedback" links were added to the prod version. The reasons were varied, but everyone I consulted was in favor to the creation of such a list. While not convinced at first, I now agree to give it a go... And unless someone objects, I plan to create it on monday. Another (related) issue is the "send feedback" links and the swarm of calls for help that they allowed to come through to w-v. I think having these links on :8001 was a great success, not quite sure about :80. I can agree there *is* some interesting feedback - and not only suggested messages but more of a study of the psychology of the validator's users - in these messages, but the s/n ratio is qutie terrible. Terje has asked for some patience, which *I* can do, but apparently patiences are getting a bit thin. Potential short term solutions: - add a well-placed display:none in the CSS - comment out the code - change address. I'm sure it could be less of a waste of time if I were receiving and dispatching these, even if not in "real time". We could discuss long term solutions at our meeting on tuesday - we should have had enough input on w-v by then. Note also that if we decide to do anything "heavy" in the days to come I will not be able to do it, as I will be away from keyboards for 10 days starting next thursday. The rest of the QA Team should be around, though. -- olivier
Received on Friday, 4 June 2004 04:25:15 UTC