- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:47:43 +0100
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org> wrote: >Any idea which is best for caching? I thought XBitHack Full was the best >config for that, but I may be wrong. XBitHack is intended to preserve cacheability, yes. But we can probably combine it with AddHandler unless Apache is designed to let one kill the other. Anyone know? - -- When I decide that the situation is unacceptable for me, I'll simply fork the tree. I do _not_ appreciate being enlisted into anyone's holy wars, so unless you _really_ want to go _way_ up in my personal shitlist don't play politics in my vicinity. -- Alexander Viro on lkml -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.3 iQA/AwUBQAr+/qPyPrIkdfXsEQL8BwCeLcuk7ONmyt+YHg+DAoCsN216v8UAnRMX j3b7QecpAlBlGNcGIf+3x7xO =mecu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 18 January 2004 16:47:58 UTC