- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:40:36 +0900
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
Ville, all. On Sat, Dec 27, 2003, Ville Skyttä wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 11:40, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > > I think the CPAN dependencies-only approach works better for the > validator and checklink due to configuration issues and the need for > external binaries which obviously cannot be handled by CPAN. More info > about Bundle modules is at > http://www.cpan.org/misc/cpan-faq.html#How_make_bundle I remembered having a look at bundles a while ago but did not remember in details, thanks a lot for the pointer to the documentation. > I rolled experimental, untested Bundles for both the validator and the > link checker, they're available at http://koti.welho.com/vskytta/ Excellent! > If you wish, I can upload these to CPAN for testing. If you think it'd > be better to use Olivier's CPAN account for all validator related perl > modules there (ie. currently the same location as the LogValidator > modules), that's very much fine with me too. No clear preference. I created that CPAN account for qa-dev stuff (maybe, on second thought, I should have created it under a generic name, not mine) so this would be a good candidate, but I definitely don't mind if you think it's more convenient for you to upload them with your account. -- olivier
Received on Sunday, 4 January 2004 20:40:41 UTC