- From: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:13:35 +0900
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
Hi. I am currently working on a test suite for the Markup Validator, which will eventually be semi-automated through the use of the Log Validator. Currently the "suite" [1] is just a page with links pointing to either validation pages (using the test instance of the validator) or other "test suites", with notes about whether the page should validate or not, sometimes a description of what is being tested (XML, charset, etc). I would like to clean this up, bind it all using n3 and interface it with the Log Validator. [1] http://validator.w3.org/dev/tests/ After a better look at how MUTAT [2] works, I started wondering whether we could actually use EARL for the test descriptions. [2] http://www.barbwired.com/nadiaweb/tester/ (we have a version at w3.org but it doesn't work as well as this one, need to contact Nadiah about it) Indeed we have: - web resources (our test cases) - which we know is invalid "specX" or not - which is used to test this or that part of the validator (XML, SGML, charset, ...) - we know that for each of these test cases the current validator "gets it right" or not, which could certainly be expressed using EARL assertions. Without really wanting to start (again) a discussion about a generic Test Case Description Language, I was wondering if anyone more familiar with EARL and/or Test Cases would have comments and ideas about this. cheers, -- olivier
Received on Monday, 29 September 2003 22:13:39 UTC