- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: 16 Jun 2003 08:13:40 +0300
- To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:35, Nick Kew wrote: > On 16 Jun 2003, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > > > Well, we certainly need better messages; but I really don't want to use a > > > patched version of OpenSP for the Validator if at all possible. > > > > Hooray from the packaging point of view! :) > > It's not really a serious issue for packaging; the different sets of > messages are completely interchangable as far as building and running > a working installation are concerned. Ok, but there's stuff like <http://validator.w3.org:8001/docs/errors.html>... > > Nick, aren't your changes (or a subset of them) acceptable upstream in > > OpenSP? > > I haven't asked there. The basic issue is that some of the changes > are pretty specific to the validation task, and would probably not > be appropriate to other OpenSP applications. > > For example, it replaces a warning about NET-enabling start tag with > (from memory) "Stray slash found in start tag: are you confusing SGML > and XML (or HTML and XHTML) syntax?" > > Do you think I should post a diff to openjade-devel with a pointer to > this thread, and ask for opinions? That's what I'd do. It's a win-win situation for everyone in the end if even some of the changes are considered improvements to OpenSP and get applied there. -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 01:14:34 UTC