- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 00:48:04 +0200
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com> wrote: >The debate has come to life on www-validator again! > >I'm posting the ParserMessages.msg I use for Page Valet here, and I'll >post a pointer in the current thread on validator. Should we consider >using these (or some further-modified version) for v.w.o? Well, we certainly need better messages; but I really don't want to use a patched version of OpenSP for the Validator if at all possible. My current plan (for 0.7) is to get the message numbers out of onsgmls and keep a completely separate catalog; either to replace its messages or to supplement them. Possibly also context sensitive so that references to specific elements will trigger appropriate explanations. - -- "Temper Temper! Mr. Dre? Mr. NWA? Mr. AK, comin´ straight outta Compton and y'all better make way?" -- eminem -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP SDK 3.0.2 iQA+AwUBPuz3o6PyPrIkdfXsEQL55ACgw/noYdhHkNX5quKjylcDvQsWLbUAmLbt oZGGKYCS2YctQ4ABn3po3N4= =b6Yn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:48:17 UTC