- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: 25 Jan 2003 17:25:38 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Sat, 2003-01-25 at 16:20, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > What about making the trusted domain a configuration option? That way, > people could set it to what would fit their need on their local setup, > and we at W3C would set it for W3C? This is exactly what I meant by suggesting the W3C specific instance, but I don't think validator.w3.org/checklink should be that one. IMO, the current one should stay "generic", and a new one set up to satisfy W3C needs. The only configuration methods checklink currently supports are the command line options/form parameters and some variables in the script itself. See the script, in particular $_trusted. That's the default value for the trusted domain (and it will always be used in the current online version). Additionally, checklink should really have an external configuration file using Config::General, I'll add a RFE to bugzilla. > I'd really dislike having a tool running on a W3C site not adapted to > W3C needs... Of course. OTOH, it doesn't make sense to me to provide a public service on the W3C site which is /fixed/ (partially, in this case) to W3C needs :) I'll try to land some new code into CVS today or tomorrow for this and will post a notification here. I'll also see if I can set up a test version on qa-dev.w3.org. -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2003 10:25:34 UTC