- From: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta@iki.fi>
- Date: 02 Feb 2003 21:14:50 +0200
- To: public-qa-dev@w3.org
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 09:21, Olivier Thereaux wrote: > Agreed, however I think this applies more to what is called by the > comma tool rather than what's at validator.w3.org/checklink. In other > word, the comma tool could call checklink?uri=foobar&auth=w3.org > instead of just checklink?uri=foobar. > > Hope this makes sense. If this is really necessary, it can be implemented (please add a RFE to Bugzilla if so). But the current behaviour is that unless configured otherwise, the authentication will be sent to the hostname that requested it. I imagine this will satisfy common use cases. Regarding whether the authentication should be sent to a hostname or domain if nothing was configured or given in the command line, I went for the hostname. As Olivier said, it's the safe side, not to mention it was easier for me to implement it :) -- \/ille Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Received on Sunday, 2 February 2003 14:14:29 UTC