- From: Terje Bless <link@pobox.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 06:34:48 +0100
- To: QA Dev <public-qa-dev@w3.org>
- cc: Frederic Schutz <schutz@mathgen.ch>
[ CCed to Frederic Schutz, see below ] Since W3C-folk/Olivier has acted on the "burning" issue from 0.6.1, we may no longer be that much in need of a 0.6.1 release from a v.w3.org perspective. But there are still some open issues that could do with an update and there are packaging issues that would make a 0.6.2 release appropriate IMO. First off, IMO we should invite Frederic Schutz <schutz@mathgen.ch> who is doing the Debian packages to join the QA-Dev list. I don't know how much interest he has in the details of the Validator development and other QA-Dev topics, but it's cumbersome to do the packaging discussions in off-list email. Second, based on feedback from Frederic and Ville the plan for the postulated 0.6.2 release is as follows: 1. Change /source/ to start off with a blurb about the latest version always being available from http://v.w.org/source/. 2. Make the rest of the page refer _specifically_ to the current release (c.f. the new CVS practice which makes HEAD unsuitable). 3. Create a non-versioned /download/ directory on v.w3.org where RPMs and possibly .debs can live. This directory should not have a static index to avoid linkrot, and apart from symlinks to latest should have versioned file names. 4. Figure out how to get packages from the packagers and into this directory (an upload CGI, HTTP PUT, W3Cer to do the legwork, etc.) 5. More...? What else does Frederic/Ville need to facilitate packaging and distribution of official packages? cf. apt-get etc. When it comes to packaging I have, apart from general good quality, only one specific concern; namely that I want packages that are not in a vendor's standard distribution to be hosted somewhere at w3.org (probably v.w3.org). This mainly to make clear that the packages are "official"[0] and to make them easy to find for users. This does not, of course, prevent the packagers from viewing the v.w3.org copies as a secondary location and/or mirror of their own preferred placements. :-) Only if this doesn't inconvenience the packagers unduly, of course. Want to chime in on this Ville, Frederic[1]? [0] - The "officialness" is actually also for the benefit of the users so they won't have to worry about whether these are actually supported packages or some hack put together in 5 minutes by an unrelated party. [1] - Your message will end up in a moderation queue since you're not subscribed yet, Frederic. But the moderator can manually let any replies through, it just takes a little while. -- "A plague o' both your houses! I am sped." - Mercutio, kinsman to the Prince. See Project Gutenberg <URL:http://promo.net/pg/> for more.
Received on Saturday, 7 December 2002 00:35:00 UTC