- From: Heather Vescent <heathervescent@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:24:05 -0800
- To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, "Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken" <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Cc: "public-pwe@w3.org" <public-pwe@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+C6qMzNPr48N9p0tYu2NR--vp6X=zoc+N=whw0Dib-mesQ+Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Tzviya & All, Thanks for these great notes. I can provide some real work co-chair leadership examples, including successful succession planning and real world attempts to increase diversity and inclusion with mixed results (I would have wanted more impact, but at least we got some). I agree on the importance of chair training, and optimally chair org best practices. Again, we have a lot of this structure in the CCG that was already in place and that has been built upon. These may or not apply to other CG and WGs. I would disagree that chairs are not a leadership position. They are an operational leadership position and thus set the stage for what is accepted and unaccepted behavior. They 100% can change the tone of communities to make it more inclusive and accessible to new to the community people/companies/contributors. Or make it toxic by accepting and not calling out inappropriate behavior/list language. Here is the CCG chair job description we use: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18uPGjBw15i9jLRQ5K4SCwrrGU6zBIB3PpIap17X39fo/edit As a chair, I need the ombuds program to have real teeth so it can be used in situations where chairs can not resolve the situation directly. I wish everyone would play nice and I personally want to give the benefit of the doubt way too long, but unfortunately that is not the reality. W3C policies and process are a structure that can support these efforts, just as the process and structure supports the development of tech standards. Sorry I can't make these meetings, as they are just a bit outside my workday hours. I do appreciate the conversations and efforts. Thank you. Cheers, -Heather On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 9:41 AM Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: > Thanks, Tzviya, for noting my interest in our BLM strategy. > > Sorry to have missed this call, but I remain interested in this topic. > > Jeff > > On 2/15/2022 11:38 AM, Ralph Swick wrote: > > The record of today's meeting of the Positive Work Environment > > Community Group is > > > > https://www.w3.org/2022/02/15-pwe-minutes.html > > > > Contents > > 1. Ombuds update > > 2. Dispute Resolution draft > > 3. Black Lives Matter and Black History Month > > > > [end] > > > > -- Heather Vescent <http://www.heathervescent.com/> Co-Chair, Credentials Community Group @W3C <https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/> President, The Purple Tornado, Inc <https://thepurpletornado.com/> Author, The Secret of Spies <https://amzn.to/2GfJpXH> Author, The Cyber Attack Survival Manual <https://www.amazon.com/Cyber-Attack-Survival-Manual-Apocalypse/dp/1681886545/> Author, A Comprehensive Guide to Self Sovereign Identity <https://ssiscoop.com/> @heathervescent <https://twitter.com/heathervescent> | Film Futures <https://vimeo.com/heathervescent> | Medium <https://medium.com/@heathervescent/> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/heathervescent/> | Future of Security Updates <https://app.convertkit.com/landing_pages/325779/>
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2022 18:24:32 UTC