Re: meeting record: 2020-06-30 PWE CG

Strong +1; I see this as an editorial change that does not require
additional AC review, but I also see it as a clear improvement.  By
contrast, I see the solution in #143 as also clearly editorial, but not as
much of an improvement.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:45 AM Theresa O'Connor <hober@apple.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I wrote:
>
> >> In my view #141 is the change that needs to be made.
> >
> > I've read through the minutes of this morning's call, and the comments
> > on all three PRs, and I agree with Nigel. I'd much prefer the change
> > in #141 to the change in #143.
>
> Perhaps it's worth adding that #141 is clearly editorial in nature, so I
> don't think it would require additional AC review.
>
>
> Tess
>
>