RE: CfC for CECP

Hi Tzviya, all,

First, a couple of purely editorial nits:

-          In second paragraph of Glossary definition of "Reverse-isms" - comma is misplaced changing the meaning of the statement (highlights are added to point out the comma locations). Instead of "Because of this the following terms, are essentially meaningless and will not receive a definition in this glossary", I believe it should be "Because of this, the following terms are essentially meaningless and will not receive a definition in this glossary"

-          In Glossary definition of "Unwelcome sexual advance" - there is a line with a single word "corr" between first and second bullet. Was it supposed to be "or"?

Also, it appears that the Glossary definitions of "sexual harassment" and "unwelcome sexual advance" are reversed - the text that follows "sexual harassment" should be under "unwelcome sexual advance" and vice versa.


From: Siegman, Tzviya []
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 1:20 PM
Subject: CfC for CECP


This is a Call for Consensus for the draft of the Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct [1]. Please vote +1/-1 to show support or object to the revision of CEPC. Vote 0 to abstain by close of business on 6 January 2020. If you do not vote, we will assume that you do not object.

Comments can be sent to this list or added to GitHub at [2]. W3M will review this document simultaneously.

Please note that there are a number of issues in GitHub that are related to PWE but not to CEPC or have been deferred to a later draft. Further note that PWE has not het edited the Procedures document or addressed the ombudsperson program. We have a lot to do in 2020!

Thank you to everyone for your valuable input, especially Ada, who did the majority of the editorial work.



Tzviya Siegman
Information Standards Lead

Received on Thursday, 19 December 2019 19:05:33 UTC