PWETF -- next steps?

Hi All --
Thanks, in particular, to Tzviya, Florian and Antonio, for your responses since our TPAC gathering. I now added my notes to the minutes started by Amy:  https://www.w3.org/wiki/PWE/201609_TPAC . 
I also did some minor editing on Amy's section -- correcting a few spellings and punctuation, adding people's affiliations in the initial list. (You should check to see if you are listed correctly!)
---------------------------------------

Now the question is, what next? Should we have regular meetings? What would be our main focus? and so on ...  Amy and I will propose some possibilities shortly. 

  -- Ann
Ann Bassetti


 

    On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 10:08 AM, Antonio Olmo Titos <antonio@w3.org> wrote:
 

 Thank you Ann for taking notes, and Amy for putting them on the wiki :)

On 27/09/16 Florian wrote:
> I think we brought up a number of important issues and hinted at some potential solutions during the meeting, but we did not really address how we would structure our work going forward. Here I may simply be showing my ignorance about how this group has worked in the past, but I'd appreciate if you could share your thoughts about that.

I am curious too to know what others think should be the next steps (if any).

• Revisit and update PWE documentation?
• Advertise those documents (more) among staff and/or members?
• Discuss specific incidents (w/o identifiable personal info, of course)?
• Gather statistics?

I'd be OK if the answer is "well, nothing in particular" — that'd be a good sign, in a way :)

>> On Sep 26 2016 Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken wrote:
>> I think Dave Cramer, Florian Rovial, Romain Deltour, and I said they wanted to join. I am not sure whether Antonio mentioned it.

(Yes; I joined shortly after our TPAC meeting :)

-- 
Antonio Olmo Titos — web developer, W3C
antonio@w3.org · https://w3.org/People/Antonio





   

Received on Friday, 4 November 2016 18:31:06 UTC