- From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:23:52 -0400
- To: "public-push-pag@w3.org" <public-push-pag@w3.org>
Our next scheduled call is this coming Tuesday, October 15. *IF* we can get the final patent analyses done, we can use the call to review and build the PAG report. Attendance has been dropping off on the calls -- I recognize that schedules are tight, but please let me know if you think we can have a productive call tomorrow or should postpone to the following Tuesday. (11 AM Boston, the 15th or the 22d) https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis and http://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/PAG_Report Thanks, --Wendy On 09/27/2013 11:03 AM, Wendy Seltzer wrote: > Hi Push API PAG team, > > For Tuesday's call, we're aiming to have the claims analysis completed. > If you can add to the wiki to get through the last few patent claims > before Tuesday, please do so: > https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis > (the items noted in my last email below still need takers!) > > Agenda: > 1. Agenda-bashing and review > 2. Review claims analysis > https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis > 3. Review and fill in blanks on draft PAG report > http://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/PAG_Report > 4. Volunteers and other resources? > 5. AOB > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: Push API PAG: Please help complete the claims analysis > Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:19:16 -0400 > From: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> > Organization: W3C > To: public-push-pag@w3.org <public-push-pag@w3.org> > > Hi members of the Push API PAG; > > As we discussed on the last call, we're nearly done with a first cut > analysis of the disclosed patents' claims against the Push API spec. > https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis > > We still need analysis of the final three patents (JP 3917596, EP > 1322072, US 7079517). I have asked our Keio team for help with the > Japanese patent. > > Please edit the wiki to add these final parts and review what's already > there. To date, the analysis suggests that none of the claims reviewed > are "Essential Claims" under the Patent Policy. > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#def-essential-definition > > If we can complete the chart this week, we can be ready to consider a > draft PAG Report on our next call, Tuesday, October 1 (11 AM Boston). > > In the meantime, Microsoft informs me that based on public information, > no patents were to be transferred, only licensed, in the proposed deal > with Nokia, and that it will be several months before that deal closes. > > Best, > --Wendy > -- Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) Policy Counsel, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile)
Received on Friday, 11 October 2013 18:23:54 UTC