Re: [Agenda] Next Push API PAG call, 19 August

On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:20:02 +0500, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA <efc@tid.es>  
wrote:

> Hi Chaals,
>
> Thanks for the suggestion. We will take it into account for future  
> versions.

Thank you.

> The new version published as WD is basically the same as the ED which is  
> available since the PAG started, so if you had read that ED you  
> shouldn't care about this new WD. If you had read the previous WD (dated  
> 20121018) you'd rather read the new version thoroughly as there are  
> significant changes.
>
> I hope it helps.

It does, a lot. So again, thank you.

cheers

Chaals

> Regards,
> Eduardo.
>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]
>> Enviado el: martes, 20 de agosto de 2013 9:29
>> Para: Doug Turner; EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
>> CC: public-push-pag@w3.org; Wendy Seltzer; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
>> Asunto: Re: [Agenda] Next Push API PAG call, 19 August
>>
>> Hi Eduardo, Bryan,
>>
>> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:55:14 +0400, EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
>> <efc@tid.es>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > We, the editors use GitHub for developing the spec. You can find the
>> > changelog at:
>> > https://github.com/telefonicaid/WebAPISpecs/commits/develop/Push
>>
>> Yeah, a detailed log is a good thing to have. but it isn't very helpful
>> when looking for "did any features actually change?", which is what you
>> need to know for a patent review.. If you guys could go through the
>> changelog and provide a list of the actual feature changes between
>> publications, that is really helpful.
>>
>> See e.g.
>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-proposals/raw-
>> file/default/longdesc1/longdesc.html#changes>
>> for the sort of thing I mean - it's a pretty basic list, but people  
>> should
>> be able to use it to very very quickly check whether a review they did  
>> is
>> still valid.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Chaals
>>
>> > Best regards,
>> > Eduardo.
>> >
>> > De: Doug Turner [mailto:doug.turner@gmail.com]
>> > Enviado el: martes, 20 de agosto de 2013 8:44
>> > Para: Charles McCathie Nevile
>> > CC: public-push-pag@w3.org; Wendy Seltzer; SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
>> > Asunto: Re: [Agenda] Next Push API PAG call, 19 August
>> >
>> > Regrets.
>> >
>> > On Monday, August 19, 2013, Charles McCathie Nevile wrote:
>> > On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:15:17 +0400, Wendy Seltzer
>> > <wseltzer@w3.org<mailto:wseltzer@w3.org>> wrote:
>> > Our next call will be tomorrow, 19 August, at 11 AM Boston time (1500
>> > UTC).
>> >
>> > I make that the 20th of August, although I am not good at calendars...
>> >
>> > I am unlikely to attend the call, so please accept my regrets.  
>> (Unless I
>> > actually do show up). In any case I am afraid I have no progress to
>> > report, although I expect to print me a lot of documents on wednesday  
>> so
>> > I can read them side by side and see what I can learn.
>> >
>> > Note that the spec has been updated, last Thursday. Unfortunately  
>> there
>> > isn't a changelog published - I'll ask the editors to add one so in
>> > future we can save time re-reviewing and just see what is actually
>> > different at a glance.
>> >
>> > cheers
>> >
>> > Chaals
>> > *SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)*
>> > Tuesday,19 August 15:00-16:00 UTC
>> >
>> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=08&day=19
>> &year=2013&hour=15&min=00&sec=0&p1=0>
>> > (11:00am-12:00pm Boston local)
>> > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200 <tel:+1.617.761.6200>, conference 72724
>> > ("PAPAG")
>> >
>> > Agenda:
>> > 0. Agenda bashing and approve past minutes:
>> > http://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Main_Page#Minutes
>> >
>> > 1. Review progress on Claims Analysis,
>> > https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis
>> > Thanks to Eduardo and Chaals for additions to the wiki beginning our
>> > analysis against the spec
>> >
>> > Reviewing the patents' independent claims
>> > https://www.w3.org/2013/papag/wiki/Claims_Analysis
>> > against the current Editor's Draft,
>> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/tip/index.html
>> >
>> > 2. Questions for Nokia? They are working on responses to our prior
>> > questions.
>> >
>> > 3. Volunteers and additional resources?
>> > 4. AOB
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Wendy
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office,  
>> Yandex
>> >       chaals@yandex-team.ru<mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru>         Find
>> > more at http://yandex.com
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > // mobile
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> >
>> > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede  
>> consultar
>> > nuestra pol?tica de env?o y recepci?n de correo electr?nico en el  
>> enlace
>> > situado m?s abajo.
>> > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send  
>> and
>> > receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
>> > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
>>
>>
>> --
>> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>>          chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com
>
> ________________________________
>
> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar  
> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace  
> situado más abajo.
> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and  
> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Thursday, 22 August 2013 13:00:12 UTC