Final items related to the Accessibility Summary

Dear All,

 

We are close to finishing the Accessibility Summary work. I have created an
issue with comments and questions at:

https://github.com/w3c/publ-a11y/issues/135

 

Feel free to make comments there or on this mailing list. I have reproduced
the full issue below. The major questions are:

 

Is there anybody else that should be listed in the acknowledgements?

Should the Conformance table head say, "Example text" instead of "Suggested
summary?" 

Do we want one or more additional examples? If yes, who wants to write them?

 

To view the current Accessibility Summary in its entirety visit:

https://w3c.github.io/publ-a11y/drafts/schema-a11y-summary/

Best

George

Full issue below:

 

Accessibility Summary final questions

 

We agreed that a single issue would be created that identifies what yet
remains to be done. That list is below.

 

* Should the table in the section Accessibility Conformance Related
Statements use Example statement 

instead of Suggested Summary?

 

* In the features table:

In long description is missing, protraying. is misspelled and should be
portraying.

 

* Reading order is not filled in.  If the proper reading order is not
present, it should be noted. I think this should be filled in.

 

* In structural navigation there is a dangling word "navigation"

 

* Transcript has no information field. It should say that if transcripts of
audio are provided, it should be noted.

 

* TTS markup has no example. We should get something from the Pronunciation
task force. George sent an email requesting this.  Also, there is a typo in
the information,  it should be provided, missing the d.

 

* We have two examples. Do we want to add more? If yes, who wants to write
it?

 

* Is the acknowledgements complete?

The editors are in the acknowledgements, is that customary?