- From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 16:48:00 +0100
- To: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
- Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, AUDRAIN LUC <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, "public-publishingbg@w3.org" <public-publishingbg@w3.org>, Rick Johnson <rick.johnson@ingramcontent.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAK2GfGyzMuzHoHS-Z7Qa6bK4=dLedpMJOfR1zc-Z-ptmEHsOA@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Liisa and al, I try to make myself clearer by starting a new thread [[ As Daniel pointed out, I would STRONGLY suggest to reconsider the fact that there is NO W3C STAFF as co-chairs W3C has a huge value and its STAFF is definitely part of it ]] I rephrase myself and propose the title of this thread In the following list, I would like to see W3C staff (Ivan and Bill, but not only as Liam, Karen, Bernard, to name a few are already participating) in the list of co-chairs [[ Ric Johnson (Ingram / VitalSource) - co-chair Publishing BG Liisa McCloy-Kelley (Penguin Random House) - co-chair Publishing BG Luc Audrain (Hachette Livre) - co-chair Publishing BG Dave Cramer (Hachette Book Group) - co-chair EPUB 3 CG Rachel Comerford (Macmillan Learning) - co-chair EPUB 3 CG Tzivya Siegman (Wiley) - co-chair Publishing WG Garth Conboy (Google) - co-chair Publishing WG George Kerscher (DAISY) - co-lead, PBG a11y task force Bill Kasdorf (Apex) - co-lead, PBG external coordination task force Daihei Shiohama (Media Do) - co-lead, PBG external coordination task force ]] Cheers Mohamed On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 4:33 PM, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa < lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote: > Mohamed- > > > > Just a point of clarification- there is no exclusion of W3C Staff. Bill > McCoy and Ivan Herman are the W3C staff assigned to the publishing@W3C > work and are both very instrumental to ensuring that we are following the > processes and moving the work forward. They are both ex officio members of > the proposed Steering Committee and we can spell that out if it helps > clarify. > > > > What changes to the charter would you like to see? > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Liisa McCloy-Kelley > > Co-Chair, W3C Publishing Business Group > > > > VP, Director Ebook Product Development & Innovation > > Penguin Random House > > lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com > > > > > > > > *From: *<innovimax@gmail.com> on behalf of Innovimax W3C < > innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, February 5, 2018 at 10:17 AM > *To: *Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> > *Cc: *Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>, AUDRAIN LUC < > LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, "public-publishingbg@w3.org" < > public-publishingbg@w3.org>, W3C Team Digital Publishing < > team-dig-publishing@w3.org>, "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@ > penguinrandomhouse.com>, Rick Johnson <rick.johnson@ingramcontent.com>, > Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org> > *Subject: *Re: 72 hour call for consensus election of new PBG Steering > Committee slate > > > > +10 to Daniel here > > > > Hickjacking the process, whatever the reason, proves always to be a very > bad idea in the long run, and I plan for a long run of this work, now here > at the W3C > > > > As Daniel pointed out, I would STRONGLY suggest to reconsider the fact > that there is NO W3C STAFF as co-chairs > > > > W3C has a huge value and its STAFF is definitely part of it > > > > Furthermore, it is always a good use of our time to revise a suboptimal > charter > > > > Cheers > > > > Mohamed > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive- > innovations.com> wrote: > > Le 02/02/2018 à 19:10, Dave Cramer a écrit : > > > +1 to the candidates. > > Yes. I was not commenting on the candidates themselves, who all > have full legitimacy for the role (although they are not the only > ones). > > I am much, much more circumspect about the need to have a SC > at all. I was already quite concerned about it before, but I am > now thinking the existence of the SC is a critical issue. In > particular, the W3C CG and BG Process explicitly reads: > > - (Groups) must be fair and must not unreasonably favor or > discriminate against any group participant or their employer. > - (Groups) must not conflict with (..) this Community and Business > Group Process > > In W3C space, "must" and "must not" are strong words. > A Steering Committee, allowed to take any action on behalf of the BG, > *is* favoring some participants over the other ones. It is then a > violation of the Process and this is forbidden, period. A deep > clarification through a Charter amendment is absolutely needed. > > > But we really should change the charter(s) if we're going to > > change how we organize the work. > > The fact the BG violates so blatantly its own Charter or its Process > on multiple counts, even out of good will, is a strong concern to me. I > will carefully review the implications of a positive decision if that > happens without Charter amendment; I'm not excluding an official > response based on W3C Process and W3C Business Groups Process. > > To be even clearer, experiments and pragmatism are *always* good. I > spent the 7.5 years of my CSS WG chairmanship calling for more > pragmatism. But the BG gave itself an operating process. It kept it > despite of some negative feedback on the Charter before the group > started operating, feedback that was *exactly* in the scope of the > current discussion. I appreciate the fact there is now a consensus to > change it; but do it by the rules (ie. amending the Charter) or don't do > it. > > I am also urging this Group to start caring more about its W3C context. > It just cannot continue making decisions as if there were no Process or > Charter *governing* them. Thank you. > > </Daniel> > > > > > -- > > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > <https://maps.google.com/?q=9,+impasse+des+Orteaux+%0D+75020+Paris&entry=gmail&source=g> > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 <+33%209%2052%2047%2057%2087> > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 <+33%201%2043%2056%2017%2046> > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 € > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 9 52 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Monday, 5 February 2018 15:48:32 UTC