- From: Ric Wright <rkwright@geofx.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:46:02 -0700
- To: "laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org" <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>, Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com>
- CC: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D6F261B0.627E4E%rkwright@geofx.com>
I think that Georgešs plan is excellent, but shouldnšt there is an item for extending EPUBCheck to cover 3.2? I think we all agree on this needs, but seems like it should be part of the plan. Of course, these three items (I.e. 3, 4 and 4b) are a LOT of work, but what of that? :-) Ric From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org> Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 12:36 PM To: Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> Cc: George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org> Subject: Re: George's thoughts: RE: IMPORTANT: Meeting announcement and draft agenda for JWG7 of JTC1/SC34, TC46/SC4 and IEC/TC100 TA10, 2018-05, Lisbon, Portugal Resent-From: <public-publishingbg@w3.org> Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 19:37:38 +0000 + 100 to this plan. Epub 3.2 will have the media cover and the Asian industry will be able to rely on an compatible ISO standard in a correct timeframe. Cordialement, Laurent Le 10 avr. 2018 ā 19:43, Bill Kasdorf <kasdorf.bill@gmail.com> a écrit : > +1 to George's plan > --Bill K > > Bill Kasdorf > Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC > kasdorf.bill@gmail.com > +1 734-904-6252 > ISNI: http://isni.org/isni/0000000116490786 > ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786 > <https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7002-4786?lang=en> > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:30 PM, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com> wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> Based onMakotošs email below and our lengthy discussion on the call today, I >> thought I would put down my thoughts: >> >> Approach >> >> 1. Move briskly forward to develop EPUB 3.2 as a W3C CG Report, i.e. the >> Standard we recommend. >> 2. Also update the Accessibility Spec to version 1.1 and submit as a CG >> report >> 3. Develop a robust test suite for EPUB 3.2 that will also help our rec track >> PWG >> 4. Develop Rachelšs Best practices (oops probably not called Rachaelšs) >> 5. Marcket the heck out of3.2 as being backward compatible as the current >> Standard. >> 6. In ISO get assurances that the standards will be freely available and may >> also be available from W3C >> 7. Ask Makoto to move forward with option 4, see below >> >> >> Option 4: International Standards for EPUB 3.0.1 (fast-track) and EPUB A11Y >> 1.0 (normal process) >> list of 4 items >> € Estimated timeline: The target date is middle 2020. (The fast-track DIS >> ballot for EPUB 3.0.1 requires 6 months and the comment disposition requires >> a few months. EPUB A11Y requires a CD ballot and a DIS ballot, at least.) >> € Pros: Not-so-late publication >> * No language in the EPUB 3.0.1 spec needs to be rewritten (Makoto please >> confirm) >> € Cons: EPUB A11Y is required to be rewritten in the ISO/IEC style, although >> it is short. >> € Cons: Might hamper the adoption of 3.2. >> >> While EPUB 3.0.1 being an ISO standard could in theory hamper 3.2 adoption, >> because of the backward compatability of 3.2 with 3.01, plus the marketing in >> support of 3.2, plus the best practices in 3.2, plus the Ace supporting 3.2, >> , plus the new epubcheck supporting 3.2, I think we are in good shape. >> >> Thatšs my thoughts and I am sure there are things missing. >> >> Best >> George >> >> From: eb2mmrt@gmail.com <eb2mmrt@gmail.com> On Behalf Of MURATA Makoto >> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 6:09 AM >> To: W3C Publishing Business Group <public-publishingbg@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: IMPORTANT: Meeting announcement and draft agenda for JWG7 of >> JTC1/SC34, TC46/SC4 and IEC/TC100 TA10, 2018-05, Lisbon, Portugal >> >> >> Dear colleagues, >> >> >> >> On May 16, SC34/JWG7 will have a comment >> >> resolution meting for the Proposed Draft Techical >> >> Specifications Ballot of EPUB 3.0.1 (PDTS 30135 -1 >> >> to 6). We have to choose either Option 4 or 5 before >> >> this meeting. We can take more time for Options 1, 2, >> >> and 3. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Makoto >> >> >> >> 2018-03-27 18:58 GMT+09:00 MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>: >>> >>> Dear colleagues, >>> >>> >>> >>> This meeting is mainly for the comment disposition of ISO/IEC PDTS >>> >>> 30135-1/66 (EPUB 3.0.1) and that of ISO/IEC PDTS 22424-1/2 (EPUB3 >>> >>> preservation). >>> >>> >>> >>> The meeting announcement and draft agenda are available at: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Mar/0384.html >>> >>> >>> >>> Referenced documents are also available at: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-archive/2018Mar/ >>> >>> >>> >>> These documents are not available to the public. I believe >>> >>> that TPI members have access to these documents. >>> >>> >>> >>> I am sure that this meeting will care the input from W3C >>> >>> very seriously. After the last meeting, I created a list >>> >>> of possible options for the standardization of EPUB >>> >>> 3.0.1/3.2. Is it possible to reach consensus on the >>> >>> choice of several options, available at: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/publ-a11y/wiki/Five-options-for-creating-ISO-IEC-spec >>> ifications >>> >>> >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> MURATA Makoto (liaison from ISO/IEC JTC1/SC34 to W3C) >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake >> >> Makoto >
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 19:47:35 UTC