- From: Bernhard Heinser <bernhard.heinser@access-for-all.ch>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:29:49 +0200
- To: public-publishingbg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <9f6d8e73-b4b5-8b4a-f081-d7b611ed7773@access-for-all.ch>
+1 / I like very much this approach. Best. Bernhard Am 08.06.2017 um 02:49 schrieb MURATA Makoto: > Dear colleagues, > > The whole point of the unification of IDPF and W3C is to > unify the web world and the publishing world. But I am wondering > if we are rather increasing the gap between the two worlds. > > See > > https://github.com/w3c/publ-cg/issues/11 > > I think that we should not > > 1) Create an EPUB-specific CSS extension > 2) Introduce more FXL metadata > > People appear to agree that 1) is bad. But I think that > 2) is also equally bad. Remember that some FXL > metadata (e.g, rendition:align-x-center) has not been > widely implemented. Even when they are implemented > in EPUB, the OWP does not have equivalent features. > > I would like to recommend two actions. > > First, we should provide a detailed prioritized requirement list > and request the CSS WG to address them. Paged media should > be top in the list. A recent submission [1] by Vivliostyle is hopefully > useful. > > Second, we should study EPUB features (e.g., media overlay) > missing in OWP, and request the entire W3C to address them. > See my list [2] of such features. > > Regards, > Makoto > > [1] https://www.w3.org/Submission/2017/01/ > [2] > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MY_qIkT8AD6m-M4mEUy7dr3jTH56Eiafdj6E2X6FsIQ/edit > > > -- Bernhard Heinser Mobile: +41 (0)79 703 37 71 Swiss Foundation Access for All / CEO (www.access-for-all.ch) bernhard.heinser@access-for-all.ch
Received on Thursday, 8 June 2017 07:30:30 UTC