Re: Notes on yesterday's SC meeting

Thank you Ivan, and my apologies to the SC.  I had this on my list to bring up, and overlooked it during the meeting.

Please respond with a +1 if you agree with announcing the new charter work, -1 if you disagree.

+1 from myself.

Rick Johnson | Co-Founder and Vice President of Solutions Engineering and Accessibility
VitalSource Technologies, LLC
get.vitalsource.com <https://get.vitalsource.com/>



From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 12:25 AM
To: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
Subject: Notes on yesterday's SC meeting
Dear all,

my apologies to have missed yesterday's call; I had some family programs that took higher priority.

Having read the minutes[1] I have an important question regarding the new, proposed, WG charter[2]. Per the official W3C process, the W3C is supposed to announce the AC about the work on the new charter, asking for comments. (This is accompanied by the creation of a new work item in our strategy team.) My question is: do the members of the SC see any reason in the preliminary version of the charter[1] for not doing that? (Knowing that the charter will be the subject of many changes due to the issues and reviews.)

If the SC is fine with this, I may merge the open PRs[3] (unless there are objections on those) early next week and go ahead. Once it is announced to the AC, we may want to forward the official announcement to the BG and the CG as well, explicitly asking for their contributions. (I am happy to do that.)

Thanks

Cheers

Ivan



[1] https://www.w3.org/2024/10/11-pbgsc-minutes.html

[2] https://w3c.github.io/publ-maintenance-wg-charter/

[3] https://github.com/w3c/publ-maintenance-wg-charter/pulls




----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/

mobile: +33 6 52 46 00 43