- From: Bill Kasdorf <bill.kasdorf@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:59:18 -0400
- To: Avneesh Singh <avneesh.sg@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Thanks, Avneesh! I can't believe I got those wrong!--Bill On 2021-06-15 12:13, Avneesh Singh wrote: > Thanks Bill. > > I would like to suggest some accuracy related corrections in the part > related to EPUBCheck contract, because our near future actions for > contract will be based on it. May be Ivan can help in correcting the > minutes. > Existing: > Avneesh: Starting phase 3 to create a prototype based on HTML validator > … Now being done manually > … This prototype will explore migrating EPUBCheck to the HTML Validator > … Plan was to propose a standing committee to work on this. > … If we move to HTML this will be really valuable > … But there is another priority: Implementing EPUB 3.3 > … EPUB 3.3 won't be implemented if it isn't in EPUBCheck > … As part of the contract the cost is the same as updating to support > 3.3 > … Main decision: do we want to swap priorities? > > correct: > Avneesh: Starting phase 3 to create a prototype based on HTML validator > … the schemas in EPUBCheck are Now being synchronized manually with > HTML validator > … This prototype will explore migrating EPUBCheck to the HTML Validator > … If we move to HTML this will be really valuable and it will reduce > cost of maintaining schema manually > … But there is another priority: Implementing EPUB 3.3 > … EPUB 3.3 won't be implemented if it isn't in EPUBCheck. > But supporting EPUB 3.3 is not in EPUBCheck contract > … the cost of developing the prototype on HTML validator is > approximately the same as to support EPUB 3.3 > … Main decision: do we want to swap priorities? > > existing: > Avneesh: EPUB 2 also points to latest version of HTML; we just do it > manually at this point. > … In the short term this won't reduce our cost; in the long term it > will make it easier to maintain. > > Correct: > Avneesh: EPUB 3.2 also points to latest version of HTML; we just do it > manually at this point. > … In the short term migration to HTML validator won't reduce our cost; > in the long term it will make it easier to maintain EPUBCheck. > So, it would not have significant effect on adding support for EPUB > 3.3. > > > Thanks > Avneesh > > -----Original Message----- From: Bill Kasdorf > Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 21:57 > To: W3C Publishing Steering Committee > Subject: Minutes from the June 11, 2021 Steering Committee meeting > > https://www.w3.org/2021/06/11-pbgsc-minutes.html -- Bill Kasdorf Principal, Kasdorf & Associates, LLC Founding Partner, Publishing Technology Partners W3C Global Publishing Evangelist bill.kasdorf@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 16 June 2021 18:00:05 UTC