Adding Comm and SysTeam folks - who might want to weigh in.
Jeff
On 5/25/2018 1:42 PM, Bill McCoy wrote:
>
> Hi Pub SC folks,
>
> Sarah Hilderley who was coordinator for EPUBZone pre IDPF-W3C
> combination recently noticed and reported that the site seems to have
> been hacked, showing non-related content and ads. Looks moderately
> benign but not good and there may be nastier malware lurking under the
> surface (so if you visit http://www.epubzone.org/ don’t click on
> anything!!).
>
>
> This website and domain was an explicit part of asset transfer from
> IDPF to W3C. Early last year (immediately after combination) W3C Comm
> team didn’t feel it made sense for us to maintain it as a separate
> identity given the resource cost of so doing, so it’s just been
> getting stale while it was unclear what to do with it.
>
> Given the hack, we now urgently need to decide and execute on a
> transition. We could shut it down altogether, for example redirecting
> the URL to w3.org/publishing, we could statically archive it
> (presumably an earlier backup as untangling the malware from the
> Drupal CMS could be challenging) as is planned with IDPF.org (at the
> moment IDPF.org is hosted on the same infrastructure as epubzone.org
> so we are just lucky it hasn’t been hacked too… yet – that’s a ticking
> fuse as it the ongoing hosting cost), or we could identify a third
> party who wanted to take it on as an independent site (so far in my
> understanding no one has offered to do that, but we haven’t
> proactively asked anyone either). I believe W3C management isn’t
> fussed about the direction as long as within the parameters that it
> won’t have ongoing cost to W3C since we’d rather direct our limited
> resources elsewhere.
>
> This was an agenda topic at a SC call a while back but I believe it
> was a call I had to miss and the minutes didn’t note anything
> specific. So I don’t know if it was discussed or if not if anyone has
> any strong opinions about it.
>
> We could temporarily take the site down to avoid spreading malware and
> if there’s no consensus relatively immediately I think that’s the path
> we should take to avoid spreading malware and giving EPUB a black eye.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --BillM
>