Re: Agenda+ for EPUB 3.2

Indeed... pretty sure the bus from Irvine will be leaving early on
Tuesday...

G


On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 9:29 AM McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <
lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote:

> Oh wow. I forgot about that as well. It means our US participation will
> also likely be even lower since it would be the evening before a holiday.
>
> On 6/29/18, 12:27 PM, "AUDRAIN LUC" <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> wrote:
>
>     Sorry, I just realized that Tuesday is Am-Asian call…
>     I’ll have to send regrets for this one.
>     But I’ll prepare on Monday a short summary of the EPUB ROADMAP TF call
>
>     Luc
>
>
>     Le 29/06/2018 12:57, « AUDRAIN LUC » <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr> a
> écrit :
>
>     >On Tuesday PBG call, I also propose to give a short summary of the
> EPUB
>     >ROADMAP TF call.
>     >
>     >Luc
>     >
>     >> Le 28 juin 2018 à 21:09, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa
>     >><lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> a écrit :
>     >>
>     >> I would also like to discuss:
>     >> - The work of the Audio TF and whether that is work that should have
>     >>started in the PBG
>     >> - Starting to discuss pagination needs when pages are removed/moved
> and
>     >>differ from print iterations
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> On 6/28/18, 11:52 AM, "AUDRAIN LUC" <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>    Good news !
>     >>    Unfortunately, I will be in a train for that SC call tomorrow,
> so I
>     >>have
>     >>    to send regrets.
>     >>    But I¹ll be at the next PBG call on Tuesday.
>     >>    Luc
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>    Le 28/06/2018 17:48, « Dave Cramer » <dauwhe@gmail.com> a écrit
> :
>     >>
>     >>> Hi,
>     >>>
>     >>> In the next SC meeting, I'd like to talk about the process for
>     >>> approving EPUB 3.2. The CG has been making good progress, and I
> feel
>     >>> that we're close to having something that is ready for wide
>     >>> review‹something that might be called a proposed specification in
> IDPF
>     >>> terms.
>     >>>
>     >>> We should try to sketch out what the full process looks like.
>     >>>
>     >>> Thanks,
>     >>>
>     >>> Dave
>     >>>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>
>
>
>