- From: Dave Cramer <dauwhe@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 12:55:08 -0400
- To: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>
- Cc: Graham Bell <graham@editeur.org>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org>, Tzviya Siegman <tsiegman@wiley.com>, George Kerscher <kerscher@montana.com>, Bill Kasdorf <bkasdorf@apexcovantage.com>, Karen Myers <karen@w3.org>, Luc Audrain <LAUDRAIN@hachette-livre.fr>, Paul Belfanti <Paul.Belfanti@ascendlearning.com>, "PBG Steering Committee (Public)" <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADxXqOw8a7r_9Tr3LeWZh1wPLKx6nTVqrbpyzybv199O_6vPGQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:23 PM, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa < lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com> wrote: > Hi All- > > Sorry I had to drop out of the discussion for the last 36 hours- it was > all the usual health and work stuff. Dang that day job. > Sorry to hear that. I hope all is well! > > I’ve tried to catch up this morning and wanted to throw in a few things > that I’m happy to put on the wiki if that helps. > > 1. I’m in agreement with those who think that plenary is the way to go > and that panels are not always great. I’ve participated in and observed few > panels over the years that I thought were engaging. Doing multiple tracks > is more work and more to manage. > > Yep. > > 1. Short topical sessions would be my preference, with a large variety > of 15-20 minute topics- this is one of the most successful things to me > about BiB. No one gets a chance to fall asleep. > > This helps the audience, and it also helps the speakers focus on what's important. But let's not have anyone drag a speaker off the stage after precisely ten minutes. > 1. The Pecha Kucha style lightening rounds at EPUB Summit were great > and that might be a good way to get things going at that slow moment after > lunch. > > Yeah, that was really quite fun! Great idea. > > 1. I’m not sure that I think “keynote” speakers are worth it. There > are few big names in all of this at this point who people would pay to come > see. > > I've generally found the keynotes to be the least interesting part of any conference I've attended. > > 1. Having a clear “networking space” for people to talk in if the > current session wasn’t to their liking would be fantastic. > > Yes! > As for themes, I feel like the overarching theme needs to be relatable, > sexy and interesting. We need something that is going to draw those folks > who think that “ebooks are done and over” and help them understand we’re > just getting started. There is so much more to do. This next evolution is > beyond anything we’ve seen in the last 18 years and has great potential. > > What if we did something like: > - The Horizon of Digital Publishing: What You Need to Be Doing NOW, What > You Need to Be Considering SOON and How the Web Will Influence the Future > of Reading > > That way the sessions could be grouped: > - Now- Accessibility, Adopt EPUB3, Why Standards Matter, The Shock of the > New > - Soon(ish)- Better formatting, Connecting Publications to the Web > - Future- EPUB 2027, PWP, web payments and all the amazing things > I really like this framing. It allows us to cover lots of topics, but gives a sense of where they fit in the proverbial "big picture." > > This type of organization would help those who are never quite sure where > something falls in the time-space continuum and need to know that we have > to use this opportunity we have to push back the edges of the box we’re in. > (and yes, you know there is one of those boxes on your doorstep right > now). > :) > > If we could get someone to talk about studies of digital reading habits > with real info, that would be a HUGE draw for more publishing people. There > is so little info out there about this that is trustworthy. > Micah has huge amounts of reading data, is totally awesome, and was one of everyone's favorite speakers at ebookcraft. Just sayin' :) Dave
Received on Friday, 12 May 2017 16:55:42 UTC