Re: Agenda for tomorrow

As a preparation of today's meeting, here is where we are with the charter issues:

Major issues
------------

Issue #15, DRM
 - Disagreement with Mozilla. My proposal is to cut back all the additional text and just say that DRM is out of scope

Issue #24, "Confusing terminology: "publication", "web publication""
 - Ongoing. At the moment
  - the commenter is against the term "Web Publication"; my proposal is that we should keep it for now
  - the commenter proposed to radically cut back on the 'Goals' section; I have proposed a replacement text
 - Would be good from somebody in the SC/BG to chime in

Minor issues
------------

Issue #35, "Mission statement still boilerplate text"
 - This is indeed true, although some changes have occurred today. This should be completed when Issue #24 is closed
Issue #21, Liaisons
  - That is more of a housekeeping issue, and aimed at internal team reviews
Issue #42, "Reference to Latinreq in the charter"
 - I have added a text, waiting for Dave Cramer to bless it and close it.
Issue #36, "i18n related thoughts"
 - This was actually closed (was the issue around the I18N review), but Makoto raised some questions. I reopened it for the good order, but I am not sure how long we should wait on Makoto's response on my answer. My instinct says this could be closed as is.
Issue #48, "Reference to BFF" #48"
 - There should be a proper reference to the BFF work in the charter.


Personally, I hope that we can close #15 by our decision, and that #24 gets to an equilibrium. The others should be manageable in the next two days, by possibly forcing closure if we get no replies.

Ivan




> On 28 Mar 2017, at 15:47, Johnson, Rick <Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com <mailto:Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com>> wrote:
> 
> Given that we left the London F2F with the assumption that the BG would not have a call until early April, and given the recognition by this group that we needed a call earlier than that to keep the charter moving on the timeline required, and given the reality of all the time pressures, vacation issues, and such, I would like to propose the following:
> 
> I start the call today acknowledging the above, and that the call today should be considered out of the norm, and will not deal with all the open issues that came out of (and since) our F2F, but rather this call will only focus on the charter, and issues around that.
> 
> Does that work for everyone?
> 
> -Rick
> 
> 
> From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>>
> Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:04 AM
> To: "McCloy-Kelley, Liisa" <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com <mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>>
> Cc: Rick Johnson <Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com <mailto:Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com>>, W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org <mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>>
> Subject: Re: Agenda for tomorrow
> 
> I would add a minor administrative request: BillK has produced a document for the charter on the business values of EPUB3 and the importance of EPUB4:
> 
> https://w3c.github.io/dpubwg-charter/EPUB4_business_case.html <https://w3c.github.io/dpubwg-charter/EPUB4_business_case.html>
> 
> the location has already created issues because people thought this document is part of the charter. I would like to put it somewhere which is clearly 'owned' by the PBG.
> 
> I am biased with my usage of GitHub, but my proposal would be to set up a separate repository w3c/pbg (or something similar) and put it there. Alternatively, I can push this document to the W3C site; the downside is that it is then very difficult for you guys to change it.
> 
> (If we set up a repo for pbg, I would like to set it up in a way that all of you in the SC would have admin, read, write, etc rights to the repo. I would need your github id for that.)
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
>> On 27 Mar 2017, at 21:57, McCloy-Kelley, Liisa <lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com <mailto:lmccloy-kelley@penguinrandomhouse.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Here are some agenda items culled from my notes:
>> 
>> 
>> - Finalize the PWG Charter
>> 
>> - Proposed solution to query re:replacement of Pierre for SC
>> - Ask Pierre/Hachette to propose a substitute
>> - Start process for elections at/after TPAC in Nov.
>> 
>> - Potential projects for handover to the PCG
>> - Developing features for Publisher Rendering Preferences
>> - Develop vocab for Edupub and alter some “should” to “must”
>> - Start work on accessibility 1.1
>> 
>> - Discuss Publishing@W3C Summit "connecting the dots, make it all work”
>> 
>> - Time permitting, Discuss communication methods- EPUBZone, articles, how do people want to hear about updates?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: <Johnson>, Rick <Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com <mailto:Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com>>
>> Date: Monday, March 27, 2017 at 3:44 PM
>> To: W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
>> Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org <mailto:ivan@w3.org>>, Bill McCoy <bmccoy@w3.org <mailto:bmccoy@w3.org>>
>> Subject: Agenda for tomorrow
>> Resent-From: <public-publishing-sc@w3.org <mailto:public-publishing-sc@w3.org>>
>> Resent-Date: Monday, March 27, 2017 at 3:44 PM
>> 
>> 
>> So…. Catching up here… what items do we need to have on the agenda for tomorrows business group meeting?
>> 
>> -Rick
> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C
> Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
> mobile: +31-641044153
> ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Publishing@W3C Technical Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ <http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/>
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 <http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704>