Re: DRM Issue in the Publications WG Charter

Yea, saw that!  :-)

Thanks.

Best,
   Garth

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Johnson, Rick <
Rick.Johnson@ingramcontent.com> wrote:

> Responded, and (unfortunately) stirred the pot a bit.
>
>
>
> -Rick
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM
> *To: *W3C Publishing Steering Committee <public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Cc: *Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, "Bill McCoy (bmccoy@w3.org)" <
> bmccoy@w3.org>
> *Subject: *DRM Issue in the Publications WG Charter
> *Resent-From: *<public-publishing-sc@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, March 22, 2017 at 12:15 PM
>
>
>
> Hi DPUB SC Members,
>
>
>
> There has been some more conversation/proposed-tuning of the DRM (or not)
> text for the Charter.
>
>
>
> I think Matt has come up with a version that seems to make everybody
> happy, and is better than the wow-that's-a-mouthful version that I came up
> with during out London meeting.
>
>
>
> Can you folks please take a look at:
>
>
> <http://goog_2068236159>
>
> https://github.com/w3c/dpubwg-charter/issues/15#issuecomment-288440990
>
>
>
> and (hopefully) "bless" the new suggested text, then Ivan can get it
> formally included in the draft charter.  (Note that "Right" should be
> "Rights", but other than than, I hope it's fine)
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>    Garth
>
>
>