- From: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 09:44:56 +0900
- To: public-publishing-bg-epubrec-tf@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CALvn5EBWJjNNqs9wXqrokqh49WyA_uh+cwkGZrr8mTHHVVNVGg@mail.gmail.com>
Folks, I am sorry for not attending the teleconf this week. Tzivya and Dave appear to believe that the testing process for the REC track will provide more interoperability. I am not sure if I agree. At best, the testing process provides implementability of the EPUB 3.2 specification. It does not necessarily lead to interoperability. First, are we going to test HTML, CSS, and SVG features as part of the EPUB 3.2 REC track? Or, are we going to test EPUB-specific features only? I know that more than a half of the interoperability problems in Japan are around HTML and CSS. Second, are we going to pick two particular implemenations for each feature? Or, are we going to test if an implementation supports all features? If we pick two per each feature, will our test have any impacts on interoperability? Regards, Makoto 2018年11月27日(火) 1:21 Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>: > Here they are: > > https://w3c.github.io/publ-bg/Task_Forces/EPUBRec/2018-11-26-pubtf.html > > Cheers > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C > Publishing@W3C Technical Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704 > > -- Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake Makoto
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2018 00:46:02 UTC