Re: Sample Audiobooks as LPF's

Hello all, I think this relates to this issue:
https://github.com/w3c/publ-tests/issues/36
Regards, Daniel

On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 00:22, Garth Conboy <garth@google.com> wrote:

> Hi Publishing WG Folks,
>
> I pulled down the LPF of Crimson Fairy pointed to from here:
> https://github.com/GarthConboy/publ-tests/tree/master/test_content/audiobooks
>
> It doesn't really seem like a valid LPF to me... an extra level of
> directory at the top (as Wendy mentioned today) and a bunch of OS X
> -specific files too.
>
> I *thinik* I've got some happy LPF's here:
> https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1GKAWNfzK0K7qEAWyM2vERv71drK7TMF0
>
> There are two:
>
>    - Crimson Fairy made from the exploded sample in the above tests
>    folder, so should have Marisa's recent fixes
>    - Lady Of Shalott again from the exploded sample in the above tests
>    folder.  I changed the name of the manifest from "los.json" to
>    "publication.json" so it was a conformant LPF.
>
> Can some group of somebody's take a gander at these and see if you buy
> their validity.
>
> My "ma" (Make Audiobook) alias I used was:
>
> alias ma="rm target.lpf;zip -vr0X target * -x target.zip;mv target.zip
> target.lpf"
>
>
> The "ma" command should be run from the "root" of the Audiobook folder
> (the one with "publication.json" in it) -- it will leave behind the LPF
> named "target.lpf".  Yes, it doesn't compress anything in the archive, but
> that will make little practical difference, as the size is taken up by the
> MP3's, and you only "SHOULD" compress the other files.
>
> Please let me know.  If approved, I'll get these updated LPF's pointed to
> from the github repository.
>
> Best,
>    Garth
>
>