Re: [pwg] Proposed Vote for Publication of LPF and moving to CR

Hi all,

> 1st Item: Proposal for publishing the Lightweight Packaging Format note, with the shortname of LPF, and full name Lightweight Packaging Format
> Please vote (+1, 0, or -1), if voting in the negative (-1), please provide a reason.

-1
Reason:
1. "LPF" is known as an abbreviation for "Low-pass filter". "Low-pass filter" comes to the top in various search engines' results by "LPF".
2. "Packaging Format" is a general name and is conceptually too broad. Wikipedia also has an entry called "Package Format".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Package_format

3. I think we should include the word "Publication" or "Publishing".
4. If the short name is used as "MediaType"(like application/lpf+zip) , I think "f" for "Format" should not be included.
Sorry, I did not participate in the previous discussion.
I propose some alternatives.
Lightweight Publication Packaging Format / lpp
Lightweight Publication Packaging / lpp
Lightweight Publication Archives / lpa

If those alternatives have already been discussed in the "naming battles months ago", I am not going to insist on it.

> 2nd Item: Proposal to move Audiobooks and Publication Manifest to CR.
> Please vote (+1, 0, or -1), if voting in the negative (-1), please provide a reason.

+1
-------------------------------------------------
株式会社ボイジャー 小池利明
koike@voyager.co.jp
Toshiaki Koike (Voyager Japan, Inc.)
-------------------------------------------------
On 11月 12 2019, at 5:31 午前, Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> As discussed in the call today (minutes here: https://www.w3.org/publishing/groups/publ-wg/Meetings/Minutes/2019/2019-11-11-pwg), we have two items on the agenda for next week that require your input.
>
> 1st Item: Proposal for publishing the Lightweight Packaging Format note, with the shortname of LPF, and full name Lightweight Packaging Format
>
> Please vote (+1, 0, or -1), if voting in the negative (-1), please provide a reason.
>
> Additional note, unless the name conflicts fundamentally with something we’re unaware of, we are not bikeshedding on the name for LPF.
>
> 2nd Item: Proposal to move Audiobooks and Publication Manifest to CR.
>
> Please vote (+1, 0, or -1), if voting in the negative (-1), please provide a reason.
>
> Documentation here:
> https://github.com/w3c/publ-wg/wiki/%5BPublishing-WG%5D-CR-Transition-for-pub-manifest-and-audiobooks
>
> This voting period will run from today (November 11), until November 17th at 16:00UTC, so that we can review the votes and comments before the meeting.
>
> Thank you for your participation, if there are any questions, you can reply to this email or contact any of the chairs directly.
>
> Thank you,
> Wendy
>