- From: Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 16:27:52 +0000
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, "public-publ-wg@w3.org" <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
- CC: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <DM6PR02MB40922852FA54A8975C7F37B4D59F0@DM6PR02MB4092.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
I am not familiar with the details at all, but I wanted to pass it on for precisely this reason. Thanks, Rob. Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:24 PM To: public-publ-wg@w3.org Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org> Subject: Re: FW: Microsoft's ARIA annotations proposal Is there some aspect that the Technical Recommendation for Web Annotations does not cover, beyond "Not Invented Here"? I would anticipate formal objections to a new, competing specification. Thanks, Rob On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Siegman, Tzviya - Hoboken <tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com>> wrote: Tzviya Siegman Information Standards Lead Wiley 201-748-6884 tsiegman@wiley.com<mailto:tsiegman@wiley.com> From: John Foliot [mailto:john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com>] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:37 AM To: Aaron Leventhal <aleventhal@google.com<mailto:aleventhal@google.com>> Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org<mailto:public-aria@w3.org>>; W3C PF - DPUB Joint Task Force <public-dpub-aria@w3.org<mailto:public-dpub-aria@w3.org>>; DPUB mailing list <public-digipub-ig@w3.org<mailto:public-digipub-ig@w3.org>> Subject: Re: Microsoft's ARIA annotations proposal +1 to Aaron, and I suspect that the folks over in dPub WG would be interested and supportive of this as well. JF On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Aaron Leventhal <aleventhal@google.com<mailto:aleventhal@google.com>> wrote: Hello, I was reading the ARIA annotations issue<https://github.com/w3c/aria/issues/749> and the linked Microsoft Position Paper on Annotations<https://www.w3.org/2014/04/annotation/submissions/Microsoft_Position_Paper_on_Annotations.pdf>. All I can say is, yes, we need this. With perhaps a few minor tweaks, the proposal is already pretty solid. It would solve a lot of real problems in group document editors. This would be very helpful for end users. I'd like to see annotations sooner than the 1.4 time frame, and look forward to implementing in Chrome, and working with platform API specs and AT vendors as well. I propose we get this on the agenda for an upcoming meeting. Thank you, Aaron -- John Foliot Principal Accessibility Strategist Deque Systems Inc. john.foliot@deque.com<mailto:john.foliot@deque.com> Advancing the mission of digital accessibility and inclusion -- Rob Sanderson Semantic Architect The Getty Trust Los Angeles, CA 90049
Received on Friday, 11 May 2018 16:28:22 UTC