- From: Romain <rdeltour@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:05:37 +0200
- To: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 28 July 2017 20:06:02 UTC
> On 28 Jul 2017, at 21:55, MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp <mailto:eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>> wrote: > > >- assuming that the manifest is an external non-HTML document (read JSON), its URL is different from any of the URLs to the HTML content. > > I do not agree. One option for representing manifests is to augment > navigation documents, which is HTML. I'm aware that there's no consensus on external manifest vs. embedded manifest; the above is to be interpreted as *if* the manifest is external, then its URL is different from one of a primary resource. Romain.
Received on Friday, 28 July 2017 20:06:02 UTC