Re: resource naming

ok for "primary resource" for spine items and secondary resources for other resources. 
But "spine resources" could also be a very good term, as the notion of spine is a good notion for our use case. 

Laurent

> Le 27 juil. 2017 à 03:52, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> One question we keep bumping into, as on the last call, is what to call a resource in the spine/reading order (whatever your preferred terminology is).
>  
> Is "primary resource" good enough? Do we need something more descriptive, like epub's "content document"?
>  
> The corollary question is do we need a name for all other resources to clearly separate, and if so, what? Subresources?
>  
> Matt