W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > July 2017

Re: resource naming

From: Laurent Le Meur <laurent.lemeur@edrlab.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:46:58 +0200
To: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <ABB74D63-E88B-48F5-B9F0-62B5FCB65FFF@edrlab.org>
ok for "primary resource" for spine items and secondary resources for other resources. 
But "spine resources" could also be a very good term, as the notion of spine is a good notion for our use case. 


> Le 27 juil. 2017 à 03:52, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com> a écrit :
> One question we keep bumping into, as on the last call, is what to call a resource in the spine/reading order (whatever your preferred terminology is).
> Is "primary resource" good enough? Do we need something more descriptive, like epub's "content document"?
> The corollary question is do we need a name for all other resources to clearly separate, and if so, what? Subresources?
> Matt

Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 14:47:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:14 UTC