- From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 20:42:54 -0700
- To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 03:43:17 UTC
+1 to "primary resource" (but that's just me). Best, Garth On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com> wrote: > One question we keep bumping into, as on the last call, is what to call a > resource in the spine/reading order (whatever your preferred terminology > is). > > > > Is "primary resource" good enough? Do we need something more descriptive, > like epub's "content document"? > > > > The corollary question is do we need a name for all other resources to > clearly separate, and if so, what? Subresources? > > > > Matt >
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 03:43:17 UTC