W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-publ-wg@w3.org > July 2017

Re: resource naming

From: Garth Conboy <garth@google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 20:42:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CADExNBNMunQije+B6GuLEXzAFWx49CPxbAL0TPf=-B7tJoiT-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
Cc: W3C Publishing Working Group <public-publ-wg@w3.org>
+1 to "primary resource" (but that's just me).

Best,
   Garth

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Matt Garrish <matt.garrish@gmail.com>
wrote:

> One question we keep bumping into, as on the last call, is what to call a
> resource in the spine/reading order (whatever your preferred terminology
> is).
>
>
>
> Is "primary resource" good enough? Do we need something more descriptive,
> like epub's "content document"?
>
>
>
> The corollary question is do we need a name for all other resources to
> clearly separate, and if so, what? Subresources?
>
>
>
> Matt
>
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 03:43:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:52:14 UTC